Howdy, Stranger!
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Categories
- 14.9K All Categories
- 6.4K General Discussions
- 265 New Legacy
- 29 New Legacy Bugs
- 235 PvP / VvV
- 162 Roleplay
- 439 Skills and Stats
- 227 Homes & Castles
- 612 Trade Forums
- 393 General Trade
- 219 Rares
- 4.3K Shard Forums
- 340 Atlantic
- 223 Arirang
- 5 Asuka
- 286 Baja
- 67 Balhae
- 592 Catskills
- 257 Chesapeake
- 136 Drachenfels
- 152 Europa
- 39 Formosa
- 199 Great Lakes
- 7 Hokuto
- 3 Izumo
- 120 Lake Austin
- 465 Lake Superior
- 102 Legends
- 5 Mizuho
- 5 Mugen
- 109 Napa Valley
- 102 Oceania
- 345 Origin
- 175 Pacific
- 5 Sakura
- 297 Siege
- 286 Sonoma
- 5 Wakoku
- 13 Yamato
- 14 ClassicUO Web Client
- 2.3K Customer Service
- 1.6K Bugs
- 136 Dev Feed
- 177 Forum Feedback
- 338 Test Center
Comments
As someone with a tamer with a "full" stable who doesn't currently have her taming skills on... I survive just fine not having access to my stable. That's the price I pay for even being allowed to keep my pets without the appropriate skill.
"But actively using a Skill while not having it and simply having pets in a stable, at least to my viewing do not quite look the same..."
How is it not the same? Part of actively using taming is the benefit of more stable slots to store pets. If you remove the skill, you lose that benefit. Same way removing say GM inscription removes the SDI bonus you get. Or removing 120 blacksmithing removes your ability to use all the types of ingots. You can't eat your cake and have it, too.
I said something entirely different.
# 1. When a Tamer puts Tameables in the stables using the slots coming from skill and, now, from the masteries levels, IF that same character Soulstones the Skills or simply changes the Mastery from Taming to something else, if that character was at max stables capacity they would could, possibly, take 1 tameable out of the stables but not put it back.
Sort of like the Bank Box where, if one, perhaps claiming a Token or some Holiday gift exceeeds the Bank's number of items, they can take items out of the bank box but not put them back in until they reach again an item count that is below the max limit in their Bank Box.
So, those tameables in the stables, assuming that they require Taming Skill to be controlled, would NOT be usable by a character without taming skills, I understand.
They are there, they stay there, they remain there until that character restores the Taming Skills on him/herself taking them off of the Soulstones OR, switches again the Mastery to Taming thus reestablishing the "operativeness" of that character's stables.
# 2 I was talking about keeping Stables slots separate whether they dealt with tameables which require Taming skill to be controlled, or whether they dealt with tameables which do NOT require taming skill to be controlled.
Examples could be pack horses, regular horses and so forth.
In doing this, while the character that Soulstoned the Taming Skills OR switched Mastery from taming to something else would get a "stuck" Stables (because the number of slots reduced thus having more tameables in the Stables as the "new" slots condition allows) whereas they can pull out a tameable but not put it back in UNLESS they again took the taming skills from the Soulstones and/or switched their Mastery back to Taming, this character would STILL, even with no taming Skill, be able to operate regular tameables not requiring Taming skill out of the "other", separate Stable for that character for "regular" Tameables not requiring any particular Taming skill to be controlled.
Something quite different I proposed which, to my opinion, could still permit to that character to interact with its own Stables even though they no longer have Taming skills on them because they Soulstoned them, something which Ultima Online mechanics permit and facilitate considering how Soulstones are sold at the Store AND are given as a Veteran Reward.
It is not the same, to my viewing, because a Tamer who may have tameables in the Stables, if they Soulstoned the Taming skills CANNOT use those pets, assuming that those pets have a Taming skill requirement to control them.
That is, by NOT being able to "use" that pet the character is NOT, as I see it, getting any benefit from the Taming skill.
A Blacksmith who, instead, was to be able to use the Blacksmithing skill even after having soulstoned it, would benefit from using a skill which they do not have.
To my viewing, 2 entirely different things. Entirely.
I dont want to wait 7 days. They should remove that Bonding timer. Is that next?
What stops players from putting all the TAMING Skills on say a crafter/warrior/any body that can only control a 1 slot pet and getting 16 1 slot pets and then stoning the taming skill off and by your request now have 16 pet slots that they can pick from without any worry about re-stabling even though they are over limit because of their skill set not being a tamer anymore.
How cool would that be for a warrior with
5 Frenzied Ostard with pack instincts and fire beetles, giant beetles, lesser hiryu, swamp dragon, ridgeback what ever you want and you get to have 16 total of them to pick and choose from.
You want to get rid of the bonus slots just because you want to stone yours skills off and quit using the mastery. Very selfish of you. I earn those bonus slots.
I just hope the devs do not make changes based on players who refuse to understand game mechanics.
This is something that would be extremely difficult to achieve technically as the dynamic aspect would be constantly changing with pet training among other factors. It’s much easier to give a static number & say here’s your number limit, stay within your bounds.
One major tangible benefit of being a tamer are additional taming slots. This benefit is yours regardless of use. Whether or not you chose to use them is your choice but the benefit is still there for taming/lore/vet templates. If you chose to remove your skill, currently, you lose that tangible benefit. Likewise, slots decrease. You can still remove whatever pet you wish from stables but not add to stables because you have not met the skill requirements for the tangible benefit of being a tamer.
This makes perfect sense to me and has been part of UO since soulstone inception. It can be tricky at times but they could always fix it by removing taming/lore/vet skills from the soulstone gump on chars with full slots making it impossibly to remove taming related skills until stable slot requirements were met. Double edged sword here.
I prefer them leaving it as it has been & letting me adjust my gameplay accordingly.
Is that Guide's content valid for any and all Legacy (pre-patch) pets in what a Tamer should or not do in order to preserve the specialty and uniqueness of that Legacy pet be it a Nightmare, Dragon, White Wyrm or any other Legacy (pre-patch) pet ?
No need to rush.
That is why I Soulstoned all Taming Skills for the time being and left all Pets in the Stables and am using the characters with other skills....
Over time, a little at a time I will get myself educated reading here and there about the new (for me) mechanics of Pets' training and, hopefully, I will avoid making bad mistakes that could ruin permanently my existing Pets.
As for training. You can do test center or just tame and experiment train regular pets. It's not difficult once you figure it out but it's also very easy to completely miss adding something.
RIGHT at the Official UOWiki page at https://uo.com/wiki/ultima-online-wiki/skills/animal-taming/pets-ownership/ it is clearly said
"A stable slot increase token is available from Ultima Store at a cost of 500 sovereigns, this increases stable capacity by 3 slots. Up to 7 such tokens may be applied to any one character, taking the maximum possible total from all sources to 42."
So, it is part of the Design and actually promoted with the purchase of additional Stable Slots (which is what I did) at the UO Store with Sovereigns that a single character CAN reach 42 Pets in the Stable....
I do not understand why you are criticizing me for my 15 Pets while UO supports and promotes UP TO (currently) 42 Pets in one character's stable !!!
I had ALREADY Soulstoned my Taming skills because, upon returning to UO after years away, I felt overwhelmed by the amount of new knowledge that I had to learn and since I read posted frequently warnings about not using Legacy (pre-patch) pets until one learned all of the new ins and outs of pets' training, I decided to postpone using the Tamer until I had learned more about the new Taming mechANICS....
So, I Soulstoned, the Taming skills and picked others for which this character already had used 120 powerscrolls.
Then I happened to need to use a pack horse or pack Beetle with this character and realized that I could not stable it.
Went to purchase the extra Slots with the 500 Sovereigns thinking that it would have helped me in this immediate need to stable the pack horse/pack Bettle but realized that the 500 Sovereign spent did not help me an inch, in my immediate needs...
Sure, ONCE I will "eventually" resume playing the Tamer and, thus, pick the Taming skills back up from the Soulstones then I will eventually regain use of my stables + the 3 extra slots purchased with the Sovereign but this is not helping me at all in my current, immediate need to stable a regular pack horse/pack Beetle which requires no Taming skills to be controlled.
That is why I mentioned the separation of stable slots for "regular" pets which do not require Taming to control them and more high end pets which instead require to have Taming to be controlled.
This way, in situations like mine where a player Soulstoned the Taming skills for some reasons or changed their Mastery to something else other then Taming thus no longer being able to use the stables because full of pets, they could still be able to interact with the part of the stable that can accomodate regular pets not requiring any Taming skills to be controlled.