Voting fraud in castle contest.
Seems very suspicious that all the winning designs are garbage. lol.
Could people create alts and spam vote their own or something?
Could people create alts and spam vote their own or something?
Comments
A lot of the designs are pretty to look at but not very functional or have horrible flow. I can just see an episode of Love it Or List It UO Castles with the castle owner asking Hillary to improve the functionality of their castle.
- too many doors
- steel interior doors
- too many rooms or goofy rooms
- arches PRE installed
- flat-out fugly
- zero, limited or poorly thought out customization options.
- pillars so you can't put up completely connected crenelations
- no hooks or notches so you can fully connect south & east stone walls
- fencing used as railing
- no railing
- stairs you have to run from one side of the plot to the other to go to next floor
- single wide stairs - ppl the plot is 30x30
- designs made into the floor tiles, floor tiles with designs
- too many different and poorly matched floor tiles
Pillars or walls oddly placed is because you can not span 30 tiles without support from below. The max is something like 20 tiles across.
Food for thought.
Personally I think they should just put the custom tool on production.
However, 2 changes that would drastically improve the current contest route would be:
1. A design theme for each contest
2. Independent judges
Sample themes could be:
Japanese Temple
European Fortress
Renaissance Chateau
Allowing use of granite would be a bad thing.