"their house was Condemned with vendors already inside "
If the house gets saved after going Idoc and the owners do not set their house back public, the vendors can still sell. Seen a few houses like that. No idea if they can be restocked without setting back to public tho. We can let Yoshi test that.
"their house was Condemned with vendors already inside "
If the house gets saved after going Idoc and the owners do not set their house back public, the vendors can still sell. Seen a few houses like that. No idea if they can be restocked without setting back to public tho. We can let Yoshi test that.
Would this be considered an exploit? They have knowingly stocked it ?
Honestly it was a rhetorical question as it's clearly an exploit no different than say trinsic bridge houses i expect @Mesanna will be deleting them if not changed to public?
Honestly it was a rhetorical question as it's clearly an exploit no different than say trinsic bridge houses i expect @ Mesanna will be deleting them if not changed to public?
So the vendor blocks a bridge? Get over defending cheaters and exploiters..
Honestly it was a rhetorical question as it's clearly an exploit no different than say trinsic bridge houses i expect @ Mesanna will be deleting them if not changed to public?
So the vendor blocks a bridge? Get over defending cheaters and exploiters..
New account same broken record.
Same principle its against the rules to have vendors in private housing
Honestly it was a rhetorical question as it's clearly an exploit no different than say trinsic bridge houses i expect @ Mesanna will be deleting them if not changed to public?
So the vendor blocks a bridge? Get over defending cheaters and exploiters..
New account same broken record.
Same principle its against the rules to have vendors in private housing
So did you report it or just come here and whine about it.
Honestly it was a rhetorical question as it's clearly an exploit no different than say trinsic bridge houses i expect @ Mesanna will be deleting them if not changed to public?
So the vendor blocks a bridge? Get over defending cheaters and exploiters..
New account same broken record.
Same principle its against the rules to have vendors in private housing
So did you report it or just come here and whine about it.
Well i came here to report it after verification that it's an exploit
“What is actually the problem? why does it matter that it’s private house?”
Posts on this account have been pre filtered from personal comment or opinion in an effort to suppress conservative views in order to protect the reader.
Posts on this account have been pre filtered from personal comment or opinion in an effort to suppress conservative views in order to protect the reader.
Honestly it was a rhetorical question as it's clearly an exploit no different than say trinsic bridge houses i expect @ Mesanna will be deleting them if not changed to public?
So the vendor blocks a bridge? Get over defending cheaters and exploiters..
New account same broken record.
Same principle its against the rules to have vendors in private housing
So did you report it or just come here and whine about it.
Well i came here to report it after verification that it's an exploit
This is not the correct place to report an exploit. Report in game through the help menu using the 'harrasment' option or through the contact form
Comments
New account same broken record.
why does it matter that it’s private house?”
This is not the correct place to report an exploit. Report in game through the help menu using the 'harrasment' option or through the contact form