You are certainly correct that we should see votes, not percentages. But then again we also should also have shard-bound vote rights.
As to the totals you're seeing, like others have pointed out, this is only a rounding issue, not uncommon in many data summary tables. Also can go the other way (just over 100).
That's why I wish they would just put the number of votes, percentages are just BLAH!
I don't know about the whole shard bound voting thing....it's just as easy to have someone come to your shard, give you ingots and raise loyalty to vote...so how would shard bound work exactly? I'm curious.
I see no reason to add vote count. Having only the percentage adds a 'fog of war' factor that makes the elections more interesting. I see no need to change any part of the election system.
That's why I wish they would just put the number of votes, percentages are just BLAH!
I don't know about the whole shard bound voting thing....it's just as easy to have someone come to your shard, give you ingots and raise loyalty to vote...so how would shard bound work exactly? I'm curious.
I just mentioned it in this thread as another example of something we should have but won't. There are lots of examples but that one was in my mind due to the existence of that other thread.
That's why I wish they would just put the number of votes, percentages are just BLAH!
I don't know about the whole shard bound voting thing....it's just as easy to have someone come to your shard, give you ingots and raise loyalty to vote...so how would shard bound work exactly? I'm curious.
The only way it could work is to only let each account vote once, period. Then you’d have to decide what shard and person you wanted to vote for on your accounts(s)
A Goblin, a Gargoyle, and a Drow walk into a bar . . .
The only way it could work is to only let each account vote once, period. Then you’d have to decide what shard and person you wanted to vote for on your accounts(s)
So if you play more than one shard you dont get a vote? Yuck. Sorry. Downvote this idea. Its fine like it is.
The only way it could work is to only let each account vote once, period. Then you’d have to decide what shard and person you wanted to vote for on your accounts(s)
So if you play more than one shard you dont get a vote? Yuck. Sorry. Downvote this idea. Its fine like it is.
Never said i wanted it. just said it was the only way it would work. I play multiple shards and vote on them all.
A Goblin, a Gargoyle, and a Drow walk into a bar . . .
Comments
That's why events end "on or around" dates usually
I don't know about the whole shard bound voting thing....it's just as easy to have someone come to your shard, give you ingots and raise loyalty to vote...so how would shard bound work exactly? I'm curious.
It's just a rounding issue.
I see no reason to add vote count. Having only the percentage adds a 'fog of war' factor that makes the elections more interesting. I see no need to change any part of the election system.
Never be afraid to challenge the status quo
Yuck.
Sorry.
Downvote this idea.
Its fine like it is.
Never be afraid to challenge the status quo
for
Treasure Hunters