Is criticizing or questioning the dev team"bad"?
In the locked Anti-new player thread one of our glorious mods stated "This thread started out bad enough."
Is a civil, insightful post that is critical of the direction of the game now considered "bad" by the mod team on this forum? Mods, do you think criticizing the game or the devs with constructive input is "bad" behavior on the forum?
BTW This is not a thread to rehash the junk of that thread, but instead I would really like to know and answer to the questions above.
Is a civil, insightful post that is critical of the direction of the game now considered "bad" by the mod team on this forum? Mods, do you think criticizing the game or the devs with constructive input is "bad" behavior on the forum?
BTW This is not a thread to rehash the junk of that thread, but instead I would really like to know and answer to the questions above.
This discussion has been closed.
Comments
Also, the moderation here is similar to what you would find in China, or a 3rd world country. Silence all critics. It's identical.
However, this causes a Streisand effect, because people like myself go to stratics (more eyes to see), or even reddit or social media, and share our thoughts there. Reddit is 90% focused on private servers at this point. Almost no one is interested in the Broadsword hosted version of this game now. Go check reddit. You'll be shocked. Posts within the last few hours are about private servers, NOT the official servers. Note - Reddit has more users on it's UO forum than Official UO has subscribers. That's where we are.
Edit: I have a payed subscription until some time in this month. I've paid to post my thoughts. When you shutoff an account, it disables your account, so you cannot see the subscription time. Also, a Prorate of my money is warranted if I am not allowed to post. I bet this would have legal precedence too.