Bcz it is powerful tool for cross platform gaming to attract more players, it is fix many problems and give more options. Dunno how more options could be a bad thing.
Bcz it is powerful tool for cross platform gaming to attract more players, it is fix many problems and give more options. Dunno how more options could be a bad thing.
The team can't seem to keep what we have working why add to it?
Acknowledgment and accountability go a long way...
Bcz it is powerful tool for cross platform gaming to attract more players, it is fix many problems and give more options. Dunno how more options could be a bad thing.
The team can't seem to keep what we have working why add to it?
Honestly, they could probably get rid of CC and EC with this.
Although I do admit, I like the desktop version also.
Bcz it is powerful tool for cross platform gaming to attract more players, it is fix many problems and give more options. Dunno how more options could be a bad thing.
The team can't seem to keep what we have working why add to it?
The UO team has nothing to do with the ClassicUO Client, it's entirely made by volunteer programmers for free and pulls no resources away from the UO Team to maintain.
The web client can also be used on Non-Windows systems, expanding the ability for non PC users to play UO without needing to run a VM.
So it's an additional way to play UO, it costs the dev team nothing to make this option available. So why not?
Comments
Although I do admit, I like the desktop version also.
Never be afraid to challenge the status quo