Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Sign In

Categories

Christmas Early, thank you Devs! HUGE

1246

Comments

  • GrimbeardGrimbeard Posts: 2,391
    Well then give us back our corpses no one person has paid thus far
  • PawainPawain Posts: 10,200
    +1 for me
    +1 for @LilyGrace
    +1000 for those too afraid to say they loot corpses because that is vocally hated around here.
     B) 
    Focus on what you can do, not what you can't.
  • LilyGraceLilyGrace Posts: 990
    I thought it was pretty funny, after being scolded and insulted for wanting to be able to loot my kills and folks saying ToT's aren't meant for looting, only poor slobs on dead shards would want to bother, people were up in arms because getting rid of players running long trains of characters would mean the spawn would suck and the loot on para's wouldn't be as good. 

    Now I don't know what I am! Am I a poor slob for wanting to loot? Or am I a fool for wanting to get rid of trains because the loot I'm not supposed to want will be of poorer quality?

    Anywho...yeah! Give us back the bodies on our kills! I could use the gold.
  • Lord_NythraxLord_Nythrax Posts: 496
    No. Atlantic has only now finally become sort of playable, but it's still teetering on the edge. The lag is only tolerable by event standards. Go farm pennies somewhere else.
  • LilyGraceLilyGrace Posts: 990
    edited December 14
    You're such a ****
  • CookieCookie Posts: 1,681
    edited December 14
    LilyGrace said:
    You're such a ****
    Forums need a Like button. You'd win.

    @Kyronix - why are you listening to that player?
  • KroDuKKroDuK Posts: 650
    edited December 14
    I kinda agree with Cookie on this one but i'd thumbs up this one:
    Go farm pennies somewhere else.
     :D 


    Lily was that weirdo selling vegetables at brit bank for hours to earn litteral pennies.. the best kind of weirdo (RP)
    So rather than recognise the effort the botters went to, to set all that up - for the benefit of the players, to help get certain items, something you could never be bothered to do, you would rather drag people backwards to your neanderthal world?
    -UO official forums, brought to you by BoardSword studio
  • LilyGraceLilyGrace Posts: 990
    edited December 14
    There's just no reason to be such an ass in reply to a tongue in cheek post about finding it funny how there's two schools of thought on the looting. I don't give a flying f who loots and who doesn't. And I don't expect them to reverse their decision and bring back bodies to loot based on my post above.

    Nythrax consistently shows himself to be an abusive humorless ****.
  • KroDuKKroDuK Posts: 650
    edited December 14
    I thought u were both friendly bantering.. I respect the grind of stopping and taking the time to loot when u actively losing good money/artifact.. it's all about immersion and fun.

    Personally I decided to use the paladin instead of the sampire to feel the invasion; losing profit.

    When i was buying those vegetable from that lady with her vedgies stand at brit bank.. she was like give me 500 gold (some were "rare" drop from titan)

    To each their own immersion/fun.
    So rather than recognise the effort the botters went to, to set all that up - for the benefit of the players, to help get certain items, something you could never be bothered to do, you would rather drag people backwards to your neanderthal world?
    -UO official forums, brought to you by BoardSword studio
  • Lord_NythraxLord_Nythrax Posts: 496
    edited December 14
    LilyGrace said:
    You're such a ****


  • usernameusername Posts: 938
    Kudos to those of you in the discord that are self aware:

    This discussion has been closed.

    I will be slow to reply because I cannot log in/stay logged in to the forums.
    Make this your signature if you are tired of Vendor Search being broken, over FIVE YEARS and counting.
    Vendor search rendered useless after Publish 106 – Forsaken Foes on August 14, 2019.
  • PlayerSkillFTWPlayerSkillFTW Posts: 625
    Pawain said:
    King said:
    Pawain said:
    I thought Broadsword did try to contact the owner of that program but were told he was not supporting it anymore, so they went with ClassicUO.  

    That's funny, players want to pay him to upgrade at each patch.  Keep doing whatever messes them up Devs!  We are fine with having to patch for 10 seconds before we begin the day!

    Also it seems that this game that is declared dead regularly has enough interest to support multiple peoples income.  Dead? hmmm.

    this is BS

    Bonnie NEVER contacted him, at all
    The idea of a paid version/subscription of the program without any scripting involved was also suggested and as usual no one , no one, no one answered
    Because no one can find the Russian.

    He probably got conscripted and died in Ukraine. Either that, or EA finally issued him a "Cease & Desist" and threatened to sue him.
  • Lord_NythraxLord_Nythrax Posts: 496
    username said:
    Kudos to those of you in the discord that are self aware:



  • KroDuKKroDuK Posts: 650
    edited December 14
    username said:
    Kudos to those of you in the discord that are self aware:

    Why does he call them PvPers?
    BvBotters ain't no PvPers!

    Where they at right now? no bots; no PvP?  :#
    So rather than recognise the effort the botters went to, to set all that up - for the benefit of the players, to help get certain items, something you could never be bothered to do, you would rather drag people backwards to your neanderthal world?
    -UO official forums, brought to you by BoardSword studio
  • Lord_NythraxLord_Nythrax Posts: 496
    Cookie said:
    LilyGrace said:
    You're such a dick
    Forums need a Like button. You'd win.

    @ Kyronix - why are you listening to that player?

    Because I'm brilliant and great, and everything I say is smart and true. Also I'm one of maybe like three people on this forum who isn't some kind of barely-concealed botter and/or incompetent perma-newbie.


  • LilyGraceLilyGrace Posts: 990
    @Lord_Nythrax
    Because I'm brilliant and great, and everything I say is smart and true. Also I'm one of maybe like three people on this forum who isn't some kind of barely-concealed botter and/or incompetent perma-newbie.

    You forgot insufferably vainglorious (over a computer game of all things) smarty-pants.
  • MariahMariah Posts: 3,286Moderator
    A few posts were edited to conform to forum rules.
  • Lord_NythraxLord_Nythrax Posts: 496
    LilyGrace said:
    @ Lord_Nythrax
    Because I'm brilliant and great, and everything I say is smart and true. Also I'm one of maybe like three people on this forum who isn't some kind of barely-concealed botter and/or incompetent perma-newbie.

    You forgot insufferably vainglorious (over a computer game of all things) smarty-pants.


  • ArmyArmy Posts: 36
    The people thinking that banning the only client people used because it’s cheating solved anything are just dense. All it did was make those people quit, not because it banned cheating. I assure you..there is still cheating. They gave no alternative to a 144fps client except a web version that the kinks aren’t worked out of yet. UO community lost..UO devs lost..subs.
  • Lord_NythraxLord_Nythrax Posts: 496
    Army said:
    The people thinking that banning the only client people used because it’s cheating solved anything are just dense. All it did was make those people quit, not because it banned cheating. I assure you..there is still cheating. They gave no alternative to a 144fps client except a web version that the kinks aren’t worked out of yet. UO community lost..UO devs lost..subs.

    Truly everyone will regret not letting you bot. You sure showed us. Great post.
  • PawainPawain Posts: 10,200
    Lord_Nythrax said:
    Army said:
    The people thinking that banning the only client people used because it’s cheating solved anything are just dense. All it did was make those people quit, not because it banned cheating. I assure you..there is still cheating. They gave no alternative to a 144fps client except a web version that the kinks aren’t worked out of yet. UO community lost..UO devs lost..subs.

    Truly everyone will regret not letting you bot. You sure showed us. Great post.
    Yall sure like to accuse posters of being Bots, just because they have an opinion.  *looks at that posters name*  eh, you may be right in this case.  :D
    Focus on what you can do, not what you can't.
  • PawainPawain Posts: 10,200
    edited December 14
    Army said:
    The people thinking that banning the only client people used because it’s cheating solved anything are just dense. All it did was make those people quit, not because it banned cheating. I assure you..there is still cheating. They gave no alternative to a 144fps client except a web version that the kinks aren’t worked out of yet. UO community lost..UO devs lost..subs.
    Surely with your fancy computer, you would know you can turn it into an App.  But, you will not get the cheating add ons.  Does cheating matter to you having an account or not?
    Focus on what you can do, not what you can't.
  • PaladinBobPaladinBob Posts: 57
    oh man. no more gen chat in that clients discord to see the crying. where else can i see it? share share! we dont get many wins like this
  • PaladinBobPaladinBob Posts: 57
    Army said:
    The people thinking that banning the only client people used because it’s cheating solved anything are just dense. All it did was make those people quit, not because it banned cheating. I assure you..there is still cheating. They gave no alternative to a 144fps client except a web version that the kinks aren’t worked out of yet. UO community lost..UO devs lost..subs.
    quit or not be able to so easily and oviously cheat doesnt mattter to us either way. Sad for the 1 or 2 people that used that client just for the higher fps and not the other stuff though
  • usernameusername Posts: 938
    Army said:
    The people thinking that banning the only client people used because it’s cheating solved anything are just dense. All it did was make those people quit, not because it banned cheating. I assure you..there is still cheating. They gave no alternative to a 144fps client except a web version that the kinks aren’t worked out of yet. UO community lost..UO devs lost..subs.
    Oh no another slippery slope, surely we must let you bot else the game will die!
     
    QUIT. THE. GAME.
    This discussion has been closed.

    I will be slow to reply because I cannot log in/stay logged in to the forums.
    Make this your signature if you are tired of Vendor Search being broken, over FIVE YEARS and counting.
    Vendor search rendered useless after Publish 106 – Forsaken Foes on August 14, 2019.
  • usernameusername Posts: 938
    edited December 15
    oh man. no more gen chat in that clients discord to see the crying. where else can i see it? share share! we dont get many wins like this
    Oh wow yea just saw that now, they've nuked it. Looks like they've gotten the message and are abandoning it. We can only hope!

    The funniest was seeing all these people complain and asking every 1 hour if there's an update. Then you look in a few of the big community discords and see the same username666 spam selling gold for the last few months. ROFL. 

    Time for these people to get looking!


    This discussion has been closed.

    I will be slow to reply because I cannot log in/stay logged in to the forums.
    Make this your signature if you are tired of Vendor Search being broken, over FIVE YEARS and counting.
    Vendor search rendered useless after Publish 106 – Forsaken Foes on August 14, 2019.
  • ArmyArmy Posts: 36
    Lord_Nythrax said:
    Army said:
    The people thinking that banning the only client people used because it’s cheating solved anything are just dense. All it did was make those people quit, not because it banned cheating. I assure you..there is still cheating. They gave no alternative to a 144fps client except a web version that the kinks aren’t worked out of yet. UO community lost..UO devs lost..subs.

    Truly everyone will regret not letting you bot. You sure showed us. Great post.
    Says the genius..bottling wasn’t fixed. Good post! Uninformed or naive..which is it?
  • ArmyArmy Posts: 36
    Do you the posters here actually believe banning O stopped bots or scripts? 
  • PawainPawain Posts: 10,200
    edited December 15
    Army said:
    Do you the posters here actually believe banning O stopped bots or scripts? 
    Something happened.  Not one post about lag or not having enough to kill on Atlantic. Before there was a new one every day.

    Do you believe the fantasy world you live in?  I understand you have probably only been around other cheaters in the past.  Must be quite the shock to find so many of us do not cheat, we play for fun.
    Focus on what you can do, not what you can't.
  • SkettSkett Posts: 1,561
    edited December 15
    Army said:
    Do you the posters here actually believe banning O stopped bots or scripts? 
    No 


    Not yet …….
This discussion has been closed.